Teams

Elysium 3

2024 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Linley
published
3.39
Jessie Kremeier
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Marcia Tyack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Amy Ailts
published 3.5
3.32
Leigh Seery
published
Heidi Ford
published 3.5
3.08
Jill Wienke
published
3.06
Sandy McLoughlin
published
3.00
Colleen Mathews
published 3.5
2.99
Dominique Benson
published 3.5
2.92
Kelly Ackert
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.92
Amy Sobotka
published 3
2.76
Pamela Radtke
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.68
Diane Holland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jordan Campbell
published
Teresa Haas
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Sobotka + Kelly Ackert6067% games+4.9% vs expected
Amy Ailts + Marcia Tyack22858% games+4.0% vs expected
Amy Ailts + Colleen Mathews10952% games+3.5% vs expected
Amy Ailts + Sandy McLoughlin10850% games+3.4% vs expected
Leigh Seery + Diane Holland9354% games+2.8% vs expected
Amy Ailts + Dominique Benson7847% games+0.9% vs expected
Jill Wienke + Marcia Tyack497247% games−1.0% vs expected
Dominique Benson + Colleen Mathews9946% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Linley
59W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.65
Jessie Kremeier
122W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Marcia Tyack
140W–136L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Amy Ailts
105W–70L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Leigh Seery
66W–43L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Heidi Ford
55W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Wienke
58W–89L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sandy McLoughlin
28W–45L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Colleen Mathews
116W–153L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Dominique Benson
44W–77L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Kelly Ackert
265W–149L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Amy Sobotka
102W–85L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Pamela Radtke
104W–126L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Diane Holland
115W–101L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Jordan Campbell
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Haas
39W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.