Teams

KCox (MPCC)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-15vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Ford / Torey Parsons vs Misty Jones / Rebecca Danguy4-6, 4-6
2023-05-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRebecca Drendel vs Sarah Jacques3-6, 4-6
2023-04-24vs LO'Callaghan/Herlong (Firethorne)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTorey Parsons vs Paula Marino1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Drendel / Patti Glassner vs Michelle DeVaney / Jennifer Herlong3-6, 1-6
2023-04-17vs KBorans/JZarambo (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Drendel vs Tasha Cooper6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRebecca Drendel vs Marie Schulz6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTorey Parsons / Melissa Sullivan vs Phyllis Nussman / Laurie Hoots1-6, 0-6
2023-04-10vs DFerguson (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesTorey Parsons vs Alexis Galbreath6-1, 6-3
2023-04-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Drendel vs Lisa Long6-2, 6-4
2023-03-13vs SStorck (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Glassner / Rebecca Drendel vs Georgia Buck / Katie Monson0-6, 1-6
2023-03-06vs EBrandon (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTorey Parsons vs Margot Dorsel0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-02-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTorey Parsons vs Tara Walker2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Caroline Withers
published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Hensley
published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Drendel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Haley Timperio
published
3.02
Katie Cox
published
2.93
Torey Parsons
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Farrell
published
2.87
Kathryn Ford
published
2.72
Amanda Cash
published 3
2.71
Patti Glassner
published
Shanin Russell
published
Suzanne Crutcher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Withers
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.74
3.5
Catherine Hensley
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Rebecca Drendel
43W–52L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Haley Timperio
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Katie Cox
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Torey Parsons
48W–61L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jennifer Farrell
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Kathryn Ford
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amanda Cash
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Patti Glassner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Shanin Russell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Crutcher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.