Teams

SD 4.0 Tri Rancho Penasquitos TC/ Wilson

2022 SCTA Tri-Level Doubles WE SD · SDNC

14 players · average NTRP 3.69 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Tami Burns
published
3.79
Ann Hou
published 4
Deborah Parks
published 4
3.67
Desiree Seager
published 4
3.58
Kalpana Chalasani
published 3.5
3.46
Tomoko Hoffman
published 3.5
3.44
Helen Bruton
published 4
3.09
Julie Read
published
3.02
Sally Myungok Yeem
published
2.94
Rita Murphy
published
2.88
Chenyang Rickard
published 3
2.87
Doreen Erenea
published 3.5
2.51
Tatiana Bourd
published
Khanh Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Bruton + Desiree Seager101245% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tami Burns
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.07
4
Ann Hou
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Deborah Parks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Desiree Seager
112W–100L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Kalpana Chalasani
88W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Tomoko Hoffman
89W–99L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
4
Helen Bruton
96W–107L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Julie Read
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sally Myungok Yeem
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
Rita Murphy
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Chenyang Rickard
67W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
3.5
Doreen Erenea
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.87
Tatiana Bourd
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
Khanh Nguyen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.