Teams

Bailey/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-28vs Vogel/Hammrich/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesMeggan Grear / Ashley Johnson vs Sarah Vogel / Victoria Lubnik1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLeslie Willmore vs Jamie Walker6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Kirby-Piovarcy / Sallie Cole vs Brittany Hammrich / Paige Patton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLauren McLaughlin vs Paige Succop7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKim Thorsby / Lauren Tanner vs Casey Dyer / Katie Dowdell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-21vs Babu/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesLeslie Willmore / Ashley Johnson vs Laurie Dobbs / Rachel Oliver6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLauren McLaughlin vs Cecilia Tackett6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKellyn Bailey / Emily Bryan vs Jill Tidwell / Angie Wesley4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPaige Bacon vs Kelly Montgomery7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Thorsby / Sallie Cole vs Nicole Babu / Kate Tharp6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-07vs Goodrich/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesPaige Bacon / Ashley Johnson vs Heather Gipson / Suzanne Camping4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLeslie Willmore vs Becky Schneider6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCourtney Lastra / Meggan Grear vs Jamie Stock / Sarah Nielsen5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLauren McLaughlin vs Lauren King Saatkamp6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKelly Kirby-Piovarcy / Crystal Freeburg vs Elisa Goodrich / Emily Walker6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-31vs Babu/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaige Bacon / Courtney Lastra vs Jill Tidwell / Kelsey Wilmore3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLeslie Willmore vs Katie Ouellette6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeg Sandman / Lauren Tanner vs Laurie Dobbs / Jennifer Lucas6-7, 1-6
2026-03-25vs Shaffer/Vandever/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesHolly Fisher / Ashley Johnson vs Jessica Shaffer / Mandy Rogers1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Willmore vs Hannah Harrison3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Bacon / Crystal Freeburg vs Felicia Gannon / Ali Triplett6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLauren McLaughlin vs Sarah White6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSallie Cole / Kim Thorsby vs Kelly Vincent / Melissa Hoffman2-6, 2-6
2026-03-24vs Vogel/Hammrich/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesLeslie Willmore / Ashley Johnson vs Paige Patton / Ali Davis2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLauren McLaughlin vs Sarah Vogel6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCourtney Lastra / Meggan Grear vs Casey Dyer / Kate Long6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPaige Bacon vs Jamie Walker6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKellyn Bailey / Emily Bryan vs Katie Dowdell / Brittany Hammrich6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Leslie Willmore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Lauren McLaughlin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Holly Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Emily Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.87
Courtney Lastra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Kellyn Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Paige Bacon
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.85
Meg Sandman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Sallie Cole
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Kim Thorsby
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.61
Meggan Grear
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.60
Crystal Freeburg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellyn Bailey + Sallie Cole7163% games+14.9% vs expected
Emily Bryan + Paige Bacon5071% gamesnot enough data
Kellyn Bailey + Paige Bacon213 matchesnot enough data
Sallie Cole + Kim Thorsby123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Willmore
38W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Lauren McLaughlin
25W–2L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Holly Fisher
47W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.04
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
40W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Emily Bryan
29W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Courtney Lastra
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Kellyn Bailey
28W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Paige Bacon
30W–6L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Meg Sandman
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sallie Cole
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Kim Thorsby
17W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Meggan Grear
17W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Crystal Freeburg
15W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.