Teams

Thompson, Laura

2021 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 - Weekend · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-28vs Krishna, AngelLost 13
L#1 DoublesTana Stock / Rebecca Kowalczyk vs Ruth Ospino / Angela Joffe3-6, 5-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Andrews vs Theresa Danforth Costello6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Slavik / Karen Ramsden vs Angel Krishna / Julie Gibson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Duffy / Jane True vs Liz Krull / Cynthia Caldwell0-6, 1-6
2021-03-21vs Edwards, AliceLost 04
L#1 DoublesRebecca Kowalczyk / Maureen Lobdell vs Heidi Hoggatt / Carrie Cooper7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Andrews vs Dina Mitchell1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane True / Robin Ayers vs Alice Edwards / Amanda Miller4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Thompson / Jane Slavik vs Kristin Heurtin / Stacie Temple3-6, 1-6
2021-03-14vs Bennett, ConnieLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Andrews / Karen Ramsden vs Carol Schmer / Karen Rogers2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMeta Cunningham vs Natalie Neal3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPamela ODonnell / Michelle Waller vs Debbie Kuegler / Ronda Harness0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJane True / Maureen Lobdell vs Susan Ferguson / Beth Mundhenke6-3, 6-2
2021-03-07vs Wood, BarbaraWon 31
W#1 DoublesKathleen Duffy / Rebecca Kowalczyk vs Natalie Atwater / Barbara Wood0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaureen Lobdell vs Ryann Redmond7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Ayers / Laura Thompson vs Marcia Moroney / Deborah Weixeldorfer6-4, 4-2
W#3 DoublesJane Slavik / Michelle Waller vs Julie Fuller / Veronica Wolff6-2, 6-2
2021-02-28vs Nelson, CydneyLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela ODonnell / Kathleen Duffy vs Cynthia Petrie / Kristi LaMothe1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTana Stock / Rebecca Kowalczyk vs Sara Gilson / Christina Porto7-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesJane Slavik / Robin Ayers vs Eileen Grebowiec / Cydney Nelson3-6, 1-6
2021-02-21vs Sanders, KimberlyWon 31
W#1 DoublesMeta Cunningham / Tana Stock vs Vicky Knudson / Deborah Wagner6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMaureen Lobdell vs Brenda Foree6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Andrews / Michelle Waller vs Bannon Carney / Julie Drake2-6, 5-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Duffy / Laura Thompson vs Mary Kenady / Kim McRae7-6, 2-4, 1-0
2021-02-14vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Ramsden / Maureen Lobdell vs Angela Fredericks / Cindy Kochersperger6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRobin Ayers vs Beth Caffrey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela ODonnell / Rebecca Kowalczyk vs Jeannette Baumler / Kris Gronau7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMeta Cunningham / Jane Slavik vs Christina Gondring / Katie Chaplin6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Sarah Andrews
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Pamela ODonnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Michelle Waller
published
3.21
Meta Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.05
Robin Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Jane True
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Slavik
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Karen Ramsden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maureen Lobdell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Rebecca Kowalczyk
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tana Stock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tana Stock + Karen Ramsden6556% games+9.3% vs expected
Sarah Andrews + Meta Cunningham6155% games+8.9% vs expected
Jane Slavik + Karen Ramsden7453% games+5.7% vs expected
Rebecca Kowalczyk + Karen Ramsden5459% games+4.5% vs expected
Rebecca Kowalczyk + Kathleen Duffy8552% games+2.9% vs expected
Robin Ayers + Karen Ramsden4356% games+1.6% vs expected
Jane Slavik + Robin Ayers7751% games−0.2% vs expected
Jane True + Robin Ayers3353% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Andrews
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
Pamela ODonnell
32W–66L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Michelle Waller
107W–70L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Meta Cunningham
30W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Robin Ayers
42W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jane True
31W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.93
Jane Slavik
33W–33L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Ramsden
45W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Duffy
22W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Lobdell
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Kowalczyk
42W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tana Stock
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.