Teams

SD 7.0 Peninsula TC/ Dianne Randquist

2022 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SD · SD - Women - 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesAnnie Bixler / Susan Schraeder vs Andrea Jaksha / Anna Chamberlin1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesDianne Randquist / Susan Schraeder vs Andrea Jaksha / Anna Chamberlin6-4, 7-6
2022-07-26vs SD 7.0 Mtn View/ Aida PadillaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Schraeder / Beth Kent vs Ruby Gardner / Kathie Angione1-6, 5-7
2022-07-19vs SD LLW 7.0 SDTRC/ PeinadoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Kent / Dianne Randquist vs Helen Beran / Annie Chambers3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarla Fox / Susan Schraeder vs Diane Boudreau / Lisa Shirley2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-14vs SD 7.0 Mtn View/ Aida PadillaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDianne Randquist / Lisa Gray vs Margaret Ann Mansell / Mer Chiodo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Schraeder / Annie Bixler vs Ruby Gardner / Celia Hernandez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Diane Edge
published 3.5
3.23
Dianne Randquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Tracy Wilkinson
published
3.15
Kathryn Miller
published
3.04
Annie Bixler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Carla Fox
published 3.5
2.93
Susan Schraeder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Suzi Launey
published
Debi Rose
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Bixler + Susan Schraeder121348% gamesnot enough data
Dianne Randquist + Diane Edge224 matchesnot enough data
Dianne Randquist + Susan Schraeder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Edge
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Dianne Randquist
40W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Tracy Wilkinson
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Kathryn Miller
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Annie Bixler
15W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Carla Fox
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Susan Schraeder
64W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Suzi Launey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Debi Rose
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.