Teams

SD 4.5 Pacific Beach TC (Sat 1P)/ Park

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.64 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-01vs SD 4.5 FRCC (Sat 2:30P)/ DoyleLost 01
L#2 DoublesHillary Park / Linda Milburn vs Katherine Steinberg / Carla Hansen3-6, 1-6
2023-06-10vs SD LLW 4.5 Peninsula TC/ MartinezLost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Park / Janet Podney vs Jenna Boyhan / Irina Shkov3-6, 2-6
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Podney / Hillary Park vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-27vs SD 4.5 UCRC (Sat/ 2:30P) RoehrWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Milburn / Hillary Park vs Jacqueline Chafe / Gabrielle Bartolome7-6, 7-5
2023-05-13vs SD LLW 4.5 Peninsula TC/ MartinezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCamila Gill / Brittany Swenson vs Tiffany Kellogg / Irina Shkov7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Milburn / Hillary Park vs Jenna Boyhan / Kristine Cassar5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesHillary Park / Janet Podney vs Sundi Olson / Laura Steenstra1-6, 3-6
2023-04-29vs SD 4.5 UCRC (Sat/ 2:30P) RoehrLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrittany Swenson / Mary Gunset vs Tina Giubilato / Ana Seelinger4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-15vs SD 4.5 RPTC (Sat 12)/ SteadmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesCate Liston / Brittany Swenson vs Robyn K F Leong / Carol Donahue6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCate Liston / Brittany Swenson vs Sundi Olson / Vicky Wolfe6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanet Podney / Hillary Park vs Susie Schwaiger / Sarah Miller6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Christina Kaus
published 5
4.57
Brittany Swenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Cate Liston
published 4.5
4.25
4.24
Linda Milburn
published
4.19
Hillary Park
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.12
Ashley Jay
published 4.5
4.10
Camila Gill
published 4.5
4.09
Janet Podney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Park + Linda Milburn6257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christina Kaus
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Brittany Swenson
80W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.57
4.5
Cate Liston
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Anne-Maria Leistikow
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.25
Linda Milburn
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Hillary Park
67W–41L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Ashley Jay
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Camila Gill
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
Janet Podney
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.