Teams

CARMEL VAC 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-20vs SEASCAPE SC 18MX8.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesVictoria Bunch / Gian Pepe vs Maria Townsend / Richard Moss6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-15vs IMPERIAL TC 18MX8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Bunch / David Sperry vs Baron Bliss / Mary Steel4-6, 0-6
2025-01-12vs IMPERIAL TC 18MX8.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Sperry / Victoria Bunch vs Marcus Woods / Sarah Smith6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Lisa MacAluso
published
3.90
Victoria Bunch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Bahar Iranmanesh
published 4
3.85
George MacAluso
published
3.82
Mark Sears
published
3.77
Elizabeth Cowley
published
3.58
Dan Simpson
published 4
3.54
Julie Walton
published
3.53
Tammara Chavez
published
3.53
Ken Walton
published
3.49
Andrew Lin
published 3.5
3.46
Joel Smith
published
3.37
Diana Wheeler
published 3.5
Brandi Faia
published 3.5
John Dicconson
published
Kari Amelung
published
Murial Lin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Smith + Diana Wheeler6549% games+9.4% vs expected
Murial Lin + Andrew Lin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa MacAluso
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.09
4
Victoria Bunch
37W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Bahar Iranmanesh
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
George MacAluso
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.85
Mark Sears
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Elizabeth Cowley
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Dan Simpson
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Julie Walton
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Tammara Chavez
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Ken Walton
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.53
3.5
Andrew Lin
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Joel Smith
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.46
3.5
Diana Wheeler
22W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Brandi Faia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Dicconson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kari Amelung
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Murial Lin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.