Teams

NOGTA/Carol Tigar

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-23vs YoungWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Stamper / LAURA VAUGHN vs Betty Andersen / Charmaine Kincaid7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Tigar / Kimberly Conner vs Heather Tuttle / Criss Skinner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-09vs YoungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKimberly Conner / Lori Cook vs Criss Skinner / Claire Mcvay2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarol Tigar / Jessica Stamper vs Heather Tuttle / Charmaine Kincaid5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs YoungWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Rogg / Kimberly Conner vs Renee McClanahan / Betty Andersen7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSharel Hooper / Annette Poole vs Criss Skinner / Cornele Thomas6-1, 6-0
2025-10-19vs YoungWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Robinson / Annette Poole vs Ann Epps / Kim Glascock3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Tigar / Kimberly Rogg vs Angie Cowart / Claire Mcvay6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NOGTA/Carol Tigar50141599

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Carol Tigar
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Kimberly Rogg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Sharel Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Annette Poole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.36
Jill Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Marialice Hatch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Jessica Stamper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
LAURA VAUGHN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kimberly Conner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Stamper + Marialice Hatch5062% games+8.8% vs expected
Sharel Hooper + Carol Tigar9268% games+8.6% vs expected
Carol Tigar + Marialice Hatch3253% games+1.1% vs expected
Jessica Stamper + Carol Tigar303 matchesnot enough data
Marialice Hatch + Kimberly Rogg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Tigar
58W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Kimberly Rogg
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Sharel Hooper
30W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Annette Poole
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
35W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Jill Robinson
35W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Marialice Hatch
33W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Jessica Stamper
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
LAURA VAUGHN
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kimberly Conner
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.