Teams

DH-Thompson

2026 Combo Doubles 55 & Over-GC · Men 7.5

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Panter - Biloxi1021219
2DH-Thompson000000
3BBTC - Hutch 55+ 7.5 combo0112534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Henry P Calamari
published
3.47
Gilbert Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Donald Geier
published
3.14
Drew Adams
published
3.06
Ronnie Savoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gilbert Robinson + Ronnie Savoy4450% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Henry P Calamari
22W–20L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Gilbert Robinson
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Donald Geier
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Drew Adams
22W–38L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Ronnie Savoy
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.