Teams

Wellington - Stowell

2022 NPB 18 & Over Combo · 9.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.67 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-25vs NPB/Jupiter CC - LaMackWon 20
W#1 DoublesTere Stowell / Melissa Angel vs Colette Kienle / Andrea Wohlschlaeger1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Graff / Elizabeth Kaes vs Cheryl Hicks / Andrea LaMack6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-18vs NPB/Jupiter CC - LaMackWon 10
W#1 DoublesTere Stowell / Christie Lucia vs Margaret Campbell / Cheryl Hicks6-1, 6-4
2022-06-11vs NPB/Jupiter CC - LaMackSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTere Stowell / Elizabeth Kaes vs Lillie Hileman / Sarah Austin7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGiselle Asplundh / Kathleen Fernandes vs Jill Rickey / Krista Geoffrion3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-21vs NPB/Jupiter CC - LaMackLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Graff / Kathleen Fernandes vs Krista Geoffrion / Margaret Campbell3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTere Stowell / Elizabeth Kaes vs Andrea Wohlschlaeger / Erin Manten3-6, 0-6
2022-05-14vs NPB/Jupiter CC - LaMackLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Graff / Kathleen Fernandes vs Sheri Puppo / Deanne Decker7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGiselle Asplundh / Elizabeth Kaes vs Shelby Bates / Andrea Wohlschlaeger1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTere Stowell / Sondie Snelson vs Erin Manten / Andrea LaMack3-6, 1-6
2022-04-30vs NPB/Jupiter CC - LaMackLost 03
L#1 DoublesGiselle Asplundh / Mary Frances Cvetas vs Erin Manten / Jill Rickey6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Graff / Melissa Angel vs Sheri Puppo / Sarah Austin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTere Stowell / Sondie Snelson vs Sharon Runk / Deanne Decker1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Christie Lucia
published 5
4.47
Laura Graff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.37
Kathleen Fernandes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Giselle Asplundh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Laura Lemole Dupont
published 4.5
4.19
Tere Stowell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Elizabeth Kaes
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Graff + Kathleen Fernandes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christie Lucia
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
5
Laura Graff
36W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
4.47
4.5
Kathleen Fernandes
34W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Giselle Asplundh
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Laura Lemole Dupont
128W–74L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
Tere Stowell
27W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Elizabeth Kaes
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.