Teams

Johnson-NC-18+ 5.5

2026 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NC · Women 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCandace Kautzky / Cynthia Coleman vs Sunethra Guy / Demetrius Boyland6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelby Kennedy / Peyton Walker vs Ellie Gibbs / Heather Sappenfield4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTammy Downs / Peyton Corbin vs Shelia Anderson / Mary Dye5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-24vs Mann CCOLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Coleman / Candace Kautzky vs Margaret Baker / Haley Mann5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelby Kennedy / Madison Cleveland vs Emma Gaines / Caroline Frazer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathlene Poulelis / Peyton Walker vs MiHyang Faulks / Katy Shields6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Shelby Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Kathlene Poulelis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Peyton Corbin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Candace Kautzky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Pam Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Roni Terry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Tammy Downs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.26
Peyton Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.16
Madison Cleveland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathlene Poulelis + Shelby Kennedy5255% games+7.1% vs expected
Pam Johnson + Tammy Downs51243% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Kennedy
34W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Kathlene Poulelis
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
Peyton Corbin
18W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
2.5
Candace Kautzky
13W–10L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Pam Johnson
34W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Roni Terry
35W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Tammy Downs
27W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Peyton Walker
5W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Madison Cleveland
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.