Teams

FCCC

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-20vs LVTALost 13
W#1 DoublesJosh Shelby / Christopher Serbousek vs Daniel Ault / Dennis Flanigan7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGregory Gibbs vs Eric Sutherland2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Jones / Matthew Hoeven vs Adam Less / Greg Jette4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Nyland / Brian Dunbar vs Forest Dixon / Alan Krech3-6, 3-6
2022-07-13vs HMTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesCharles Edmondson / Matthew Hoeven vs John Agin / Kent Mueller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSean Tomlinson vs Michael Robeson6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeon Green / Mark Orr vs Steven Tucker / Kendal Sanders4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Nyland / Brian Dunbar vs Dennis Knopf / Nicola Demacopoulos7-5, 6-2
2022-07-06vs CSU WHITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJosh Shelby / Tidhar Sadeh vs Bruce Malloy / Dan Johnson7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSean Tomlinson vs Bobby Diaz2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStu Hoime / Jeff Nyland vs Richard Penhale / Mark Kramer7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-29vs MLFLost 13
L#1 DoublesTidhar Sadeh / Charles Edmondson vs Reeves Anderson / Aaron Phillips5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSean Tomlinson vs Jeremy Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJosh Shelby / Joseph Lillis vs Joe Ashbee / Nicholas Roe7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Buttonow / Gregory Gibbs vs Rodney Campos / Scott Daigle4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-22vs CSU GOLDLost 13
L#1 DoublesStu Hoime / Christopher Serbousek vs David van Thuyne / Federico Pardina3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGregory Gibbs vs Jeff Thompson6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Orr / Leon Green vs Michael Bird / Kim Bender5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Stout / Charles Edmondson vs Derrick van der Sluys / Brad Biggerstaff4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-08vs CSU GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesJoseph Lillis / Christopher Serbousek vs Gordon Motley / James Nuttall7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGregory Gibbs vs Mark Lee6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Orr / Leon Green vs Jared Habein / Donald Herriott7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hoeven / Christopher Jones vs Ernest Chavez / Jon Leydens1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Gregory Gibbs
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Charles Edmondson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Sean Tomlinson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Tidhar Sadeh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Joseph Lillis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Josh Shelby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Matthew Hoeven
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Stu Hoime
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Leon Green
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Brian Dunbar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brian Buttonow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Christopher Serbousek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Nyland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Tomlinson + Josh Shelby5558% games+5.6% vs expected
Charles Edmondson + Tidhar Sadeh5158% games+4.7% vs expected
Sean Tomlinson + Tidhar Sadeh9656% games+3.8% vs expected
Brian Dunbar + Charles Edmondson404 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Gibbs + Tidhar Sadeh224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Hoeven + Tidhar Sadeh213 matchesnot enough data
Charles Edmondson + Josh Shelby213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Lillis + Tidhar Sadeh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gregory Gibbs
84W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Charles Edmondson
41W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
Sean Tomlinson
21W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Tidhar Sadeh
41W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Joseph Lillis
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Josh Shelby
48W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Matthew Hoeven
30W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Stu Hoime
42W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
Leon Green
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brian Dunbar
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Brian Buttonow
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Christopher Serbousek
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Nyland
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.