Teams

Sun City Center - S. Williams

2026 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-09vs Apollo Beach - M. HillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Bacon / Susan Williams vs Mary Beth Sultenfuss / Betty Mahon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZan Walter / Janet Hoffman vs Audrey Cull / Kathleen Rossman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-23vs HILLS/Adult65&over8.0W/CharlesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Bacon / Susan Williams vs Xiao Zhang / Laurie Gereaue5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesZan Walter / Debra Whiteside vs Janet Matthews / Mary Klein6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPhylis Albritton / Helene Kennedy-Peterson vs Jennifer Bell / Kathy Moll3-6, 4-6
2026-02-16vs HILLS/Adult65&over8.0W/CharlesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Bacon / Susan Williams vs Anne Pulley / Beatriz Dones6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZan Walter / Debra Whiteside vs Janet Matthews / Lynn O'Brien0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-09vs Apollo Beach - M. HillerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Bacon / Janet Hoffman vs Mary Beth Sultenfuss / Mary Flynn6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesZan Walter / Debra Whiteside vs Audrey Cull / Kathleen Rossman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-19vs Apollo Beach - M. HillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Williams / Phylis Albritton vs Audrey Cull / Kathleen Rossman2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Bacon / Marti Turocy vs Mary Alice Hillier / Janet George4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Hoffman / Helene Kennedy-Peterson vs Mary Beth Sultenfuss / Rene Kenyon0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Linda Bacon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.78
Debra Whiteside
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Zan Walter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Helene Kennedy-Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marti Turocy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phylis Albritton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marti Turocy + Janet Hoffman3256% gamesnot enough data
Zan Walter + Debra Whiteside123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Williams + Linda Bacon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Bacon
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Debra Whiteside
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Zan Walter
25W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Helene Kennedy-Peterson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Hoffman
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marti Turocy
83W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Phylis Albritton
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Williams
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.