Teams

McNEICE/DEVITO

2022 Loudoun Adult Other Fall Afternoon Doubles Women · Loudoun Women's 3.0 Afternoon Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-12vs BUTLERLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaryn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden vs Ellen Gibbons / Elizabeth Pyszka6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Karen Pallotta vs Annerie Botha / Caroline Hedges4-6, 0-6
2022-12-08vs KANE/CHANGSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarguerite McFadden / Amanda Kerr vs Joanna Schindler / Ashley Whitner6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Nicole Lefton vs Cheryl Phillips / Hannah Auyang6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-10-27vs KASPER/GRAHAMLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Decker / Marguerite McFadden vs Niki Friedman / Lisa Furgal3-6, 1-6
2022-10-10vs KANE/CHANGLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarguerite McFadden / Tara Reynolds vs Julie Kane / Megan Sultan7-5, 1-4
L#3 DoublesKristy Mathey / Karen McNeice vs Amy Albanese / Catherine Chang3-6, 2-6
2022-10-03vs NYLUND/LEIBOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesEffie Hoffman / Karen McNeice vs Jennifer Leibold / Ursula Cox1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-21vs KASPER/GRAHAMLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren McNeice / Kerry Purdy vs Cathleen Porter / Laleh Packard5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Women's 3.0 Afternoon Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Amanda Kerr
published 4
3.44
Tara Reynolds
published
3.40
Karyn DeVito
published 3.5
3.28
Marguerite McFadden
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Jennifer Decker
published
2.98
Effie Hoffman
published 3
2.90
Olga Minsky
published
2.88
Kristy Mathey
published
2.76
Karen Pallotta
published
2.68
Sarah Matcher
published
2.66
Hilary Dixon
published 3
2.56
Karen McNeice
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Kerry Purdy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marguerite McFadden + Karyn DeVito261653% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Kerr
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Tara Reynolds
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Karyn DeVito
141W–116L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Marguerite McFadden
95W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Jennifer Decker
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Effie Hoffman
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Olga Minsky
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Kristy Mathey
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Karen Pallotta
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Sarah Matcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Hilary Dixon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Karen McNeice
42W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kerry Purdy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.