Teams

Pinellas/Hutton/50&Over8.5M

2024 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 8.5 M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 4.11 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-23vs SL LewinWon 20
W#2 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Gary Hutton vs Randall Meisner / Pierre Lewin6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBrian Hodapp / Monty Johnson vs Brian Cooper / Jonathan Mellen6-3, 7-5
2024-11-02vs SL LewinWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdwin Jagger / John Hockin vs Ray Pasinski / Jonathan Mellen6-3, 6-3
2024-10-26vs SL LewinWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Maisner / David Palmer vs Colin Fitzgearl / Jonathan Mellen6-3, 6-4
2024-10-05vs SL LewinWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Maisner / Chuck Goldberg vs Brian Cooper / Randall Meisner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrad Armagost / Monty Johnson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-14vs SL LewinWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Gary Hutton vs Colin Fitzgearl / Pierre Lewin6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Edwin Jagger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
3.90
David Palmer
published 4
3.89
Brian Hodapp
published 4
3.81
Monty Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Chuck Goldberg
published 4
Brad Armagost
published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.43
Gary Hutton
published 4
Robert Maisner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Palmer + Brian Hodapp7162% games+1.6% vs expected
Edwin Jagger + Robert Maisner4448% gamesnot enough data
John Hockin + Gary Hutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Edwin Jagger
57W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.06
4
David Palmer
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Monty Johnson
134W–108L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Chuck Goldberg
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Gary Hutton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
Robert Maisner
59W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.