Teams

VIP Room

2026 Players Lounge · women

27 players · average NTRP 3.11 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1VIP Room000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Andrea Schunk
published 3.5
3.37
Lisa Whalen
published
3.33
Gwen Bechtel
published
3.29
Dena Gregorio
published 3.5
3.28
Tina Huber
published
3.18
3.18
Robyn Weiss
published
2.89
Elizabeth Briganti
published
2.75
Olga Parra
published
2.74
Karen Detemple
published
2.74
Cynthia Graves
published 3
2.70
Hannah Mccaughey
published
2.68
Anne Keleher
published 3
2.66
Sarah Salvato
published
2.64
Carol Billingham
published 3
2.60
Ann Morrison
published 3
2.57
Diana Russell
published 3
2.55
Tammy Gassaway
published
2.48
Elaine Koyama
published
2.38
2.23
Liesa Reece
published
Donna Steege
published
Elizabeth Baskin
published
Katherine Lewis
published
Maria Lorenzo Sachs
published
Tina Roose
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Mccaughey + Caroline Haagenstad3246% games+1.1% vs expected
Lisa Whalen + Tina Huber4253% games−4.3% vs expected
Sarah Salvato + Cynthia Graves224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Roose + Anne Gann Everett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Schunk
71W–62L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
Lisa Whalen
25W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Gwen Bechtel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dena Gregorio
14W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Tina Huber
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
Yvette Muceno-Plaisted
40W–55L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Robyn Weiss
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Briganti
44W–77L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Anne Gann Everett
29W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Olga Parra
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Karen Detemple
9W–29L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cynthia Graves
27W–44L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Hannah Mccaughey
5W–19L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Anne Keleher
42W–56L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Sarah Salvato
79W–81L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Carol Billingham
36W–44L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Morrison
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Diana Russell
46W–71L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Tammy Gassaway
34W–53L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Elaine Koyama
11W–15L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Caroline Haagenstad
4W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.38
Liesa Reece
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Donna Steege
19W–43L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Baskin
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Lewis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Lorenzo Sachs
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Roose
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.