Teams

Treasure Bay Island Servivors

2024 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 6.5 W Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-23vs Pinellas/Weinstock/50&Over6.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Girardi / Christine Price vs Stella Maganiaris / Jani Parrish5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Walters / Kim Poynter vs Terry Kelsey / Susan Weissler2-6, 4-6
2024-11-16vs SPTC Holliday 6.5 WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLina Chaves / Debra Edwards vs Eileen Beck / michelle hirschberg3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Price / Beth Walters vs Marylou Kolenda / Cathrine Chin6-3, 7-6
2024-11-09vs SPTC FireballsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarmen Benitez / Christine Price vs Rima Terradista / Bobbi-Jo Willett7-6, 6-2
2024-11-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret McNamara / Beth Walters vs Kim Williams / Karen Miller1-6, 3-6
2024-10-26vs Ardea ShotchasersWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Lina Chaves vs Kimberly Ankney / Noella Burgeson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-21vs McMullen PronatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Poynter / Beth Walters vs Carol Melber / Laura Baker6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Lina Chaves
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Sally Blush
published
3.01
Christine Price
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Kim Poynter
published
2.94
Michele Girardi
published
2.82
Beth Walters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Debra Edwards
published 3
2.61
Patty Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Walters + Christine Price4256% gamesnot enough data
Christine Price + Lina Chaves1536% gamesnot enough data
Beth Walters + Lina Chaves123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lina Chaves
51W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Sally Blush
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kim Poynter
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Michele Girardi
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Beth Walters
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Debra Edwards
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.81
Patty Anderson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.