Teams

KMCKEE8.5_40+

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-13vs Ragsdale/GerberWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Holt-Kabel / Annette Page vs Kathryn Gerber / Amy Pena6-1, 6-0
2022-10-12vs RHOLDSTOCKWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarti May / Heather Mittag vs Alvina Oelhafen / Lucy Holding6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-19vs RBonelloSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Holt-Kabel / Kimberly Boyd vs Christina Zadell / Nicole Rahm4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Briggs / Lynne Manweiler vs Cindy Winzenz / Lucy Lewis3-6, 3-6
2022-09-17vs KRiceLost 01
L#3 DoublesMolly Briggs / Lynne Manweiler vs Kristin Sobey / Christy Team4-6, 3-6
2022-09-12vs BCopelandLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichelle Vedder / Lynne Manweiler vs Tanya Parise / Jane Britt5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Holt-Kabel / Molly Briggs vs Laura Hiller / Diane Werner5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-12vs DWEILANDWon 10
W#2 DoublesMolly Briggs / Lynne Manweiler vs Stephanie Rabby / Tiffany Harris6-4, 6-2
2022-08-29vs JRitcheyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Vedder / Lynne Manweiler vs Kana Brinckerhoff / Jeme Avent6-1, 6-3
2022-08-08vs IJLake40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarti May / Heather Mittag vs Keisha Price / QUEEN HARGROVE6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Kimberly Boyd
published
3.95
Laura Holt-Kabel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Molly Briggs
published
3.87
Olga DeGroff
published
3.79
Heather Mittag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Shannon Powell
published
3.73
Karen McKee
published
3.68
Annette Page
published 4
3.50
Lynne Manweiler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Sarah Mulligan
published
Michelle Vedder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annette Page + Molly Briggs404 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Manweiler + Heather Mittag224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Holt-Kabel + Heather Mittag213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Boyd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Laura Holt-Kabel
99W–44L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
Molly Briggs
34W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Olga DeGroff
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Heather Mittag
104W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Shannon Powell
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Karen McKee
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Annette Page
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–125L career · 5 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sarah Mulligan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Michelle Vedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.