Teams

MARION/Davis/Men/8.0

2023 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Men 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-25vs SH - FrizaloneWon 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Johnson / William Meek vs Robert B Buckner / John Fessel6-4, 6-4
2023-03-19vs FK - FranckSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDavid MacAdam / James Cernoch vs Luis Rosario / Eric Williams6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJerry Johnson / Tim Puckett vs Douglas Massinger / Ricky Slatton6-7, 4-6
2023-03-04vs SH - FrizaloneWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid MacAdam / Tim Puckett vs Joe Homan / Ken McWilliams6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Davis / William Meek vs Robert B Buckner / John Felten6-1, 6-1
2023-02-26vs SMW - TammenWon 10
W#3 DoublesStig Ljunggren / Jerry Johnson vs Craig Tammen / Gregory Morrissey6-4, 7-6
2023-02-18vs FK - FranckWon 10
W#2 DoublesStig Ljunggren / Jerry Johnson vs Eric Williams / Peter Grosshans6-0, 6-1
2023-01-21vs SH - FrizaloneWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid MacAdam / Robert Kluemper vs Nick Pingitore / John Felten6-1, 6-0
2023-01-15vs SMW - TammenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJerry Johnson / Stig Ljunggren vs Michael Brown / Rob Pridgen6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTim Call / Mark Davis vs Gregory Morrissey / Craig Tammen2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Men 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
David MacAdam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
James Cernoch
published
Jerry Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Mark Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Gisriel
published
Robert Kluemper
published
Tim Puckett
published
William Meek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Davis + Jerry Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
David MacAdam + Robert Gisriel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David MacAdam
61W–43L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
James Cernoch
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerry Johnson
68W–75L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Davis
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Gisriel
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Kluemper
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Puckett
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Meek
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.