Teams

JIM RAYMOND

2026 SETX 55 & Over · 7.0 SENIOR MEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs DAVID HAMMONSWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlie Foxworth / Kyle Stratton vs Craig Fox / Mitchell Long6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Raymond / John Hawa vs Mike Doguet / Bill Keating7-6, 6-3
2026-02-11vs DAVID HAMMONSWon 21
W#1 DoublesKyle Stratton / Dana Hanning vs Marc Mercado / Mike Doguet6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRussell Mires / Jeremy Masters vs Craig Fox / Mitchell Long1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLouis Blevins / Brian Guilbeaux vs David Hammons / Gary Cobb4-6, 1-6
2026-02-04vs DAVID HAMMONSWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Raymond / Russell Mires vs Derek Mireles / David Hammons6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRandall Vayon / Kyle Stratton vs Mike Doguet / Bill Keating6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCharlie Foxworth / Louis Blevins vs Gary Cobb / Gilbert Contreras6-4, 6-2
2026-01-28vs DAVID HAMMONSWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Hanning / Silvano Sanchez vs Craig Fox / Mitchell Long6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Hawa / Brian Guilbeaux vs Mike Doguet / Ted Caster6-2, 6-0
2026-01-21vs DAVID HAMMONSWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeremy Masters / James Raymond vs Gilbert Contreras / Craig Fox6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRussell Mires / Louis Blevins vs David Hammons / Gary Cobb7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-14vs DAVID HAMMONSWon 30
W#1 DoublesRussell Mires / Jeremy Masters vs Mike Doguet / JUAN LOPEZ6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Guilbeaux / Charlie Foxworth vs Bill Keating / Ted Caster6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDana Hanning / Kyle Stratton vs Mitchell Long / Derek Mireles6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0 SENIOR MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JIM RAYMOND601628114

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Randall Vayon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Dana Hanning
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Brian Guilbeaux
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
John Hawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Charlie Foxworth
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Russell Mires
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
James Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Kyle Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Silvano Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Louis Blevins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randall Vayon + Dana Hanning224 matchesnot enough data
Charlie Foxworth + Russell Mires213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randall Vayon
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Dana Hanning
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brian Guilbeaux
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
John Hawa
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Charlie Foxworth
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Russell Mires
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
James Raymond
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kyle Stratton
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Silvano Sanchez
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Louis Blevins
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.