Teams

McMorran/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Women 18 & over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-26vs Johnson/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauryn Yackel / Angie Ware vs Cynthia Coleman / Pam Johnson7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Shelby Kennedy2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJodi Kendall / Candi McMorran vs Lauren Downs / Michelle McKim6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-19vs Gaston/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesBrenda Kinney / Lauryn Yackel vs Jennifer Gladstone / Alaina Ward3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney Neville vs Lauren Albertine3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCandi McMorran / Amy Smith vs Christian Turner / Chapman Morrow4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Meade Carlisle3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJodi Kendall / Terry Bondurant vs Jaime Brandon / Katherine Ray6-0, 7-6
2026-04-12vs Gaston/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesSusan Patrone / Keneisha Fountain vs Sarah Heard / Meade Carlisle1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAngie Ware vs Aubrey Gulledge6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrenda Kinney / Gena Brimhall vs Chapman Morrow / Christian Turner1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Dory Gaston2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLauryn Yackel / Marielba Briceno vs Locke Waldrop / Tracye Burford6-1, 6-2
2026-03-29vs McDaniel/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesGena Brimhall / Lauryn Yackel vs Devra Hampton / Whitney Williams6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Smith / Kate Linebarger vs Hallie Templeton / Jessica McDaniel3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Kiersten Carey6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Manuel / Susan Patrone vs Madalyn McClelland / Alexandra Willis Boddie6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-22vs Nabors/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesKate Linebarger / Morgan Burton vs Jennifer London / Tabitha Arrington3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Liz Mcguire2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGena Brimhall / Angie Ware vs Libby Nabors / Ashley Folk6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLauryn Yackel vs Amanda Johnson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCourtney Neville / Jacqueline Smith vs Melissa Brown / Tammy Evangelisti6-2, 6-3
2026-03-08vs Johnson/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesGena Brimhall / Brenda Kinney vs Cynthia Coleman / Lacey Dunlap6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAngie Ware vs Shelby Kennedy1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Neda Nazemi7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCourtney Neville / Jacqueline Smith vs MacKenzie Fowler / Kristi Cherry7-6, 7-6
2026-03-01vs Scott/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesLauryn Yackel / Kimberly Manuel vs Amber Varner / Madeline Wilson1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAngie Ware vs Maggie Neal6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJodi Kendall / Candi McMorran vs Alexandria Powers / Marti Montgomery3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCrista Mcmorran vs Stephanie Gehle6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarielba Briceno / Terry Bondurant vs Sarah Hatfield / Victoria Crawford2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Courtney Neville
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.97
Angie Ware
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.93
Gena Brimhall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Crista Mcmorran
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.61
Lauryn Yackel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.57
Jodi Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Brenda Kinney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Susan Patrone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Jacqueline Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Kate Linebarger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Candi McMorran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Terry Bondurant
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.08
Keneisha Fountain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Smith + Courtney Neville7066% games+12.4% vs expected
Jodi Kendall + Candi McMorran2446% gamesnot enough data
Angie Ware + Lauryn Yackel3251% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Kendall + Terry Bondurant303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Neville
9W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Angie Ware
19W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Gena Brimhall
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Crista Mcmorran
19W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Lauryn Yackel
10W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jodi Kendall
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Brenda Kinney
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.44
Jacqueline Smith
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Kate Linebarger
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
3
Candi McMorran
13W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Terry Bondurant
29W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Keneisha Fountain
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.