Teams

Wurth 5.5 (40+)

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-18vs Davis 40s 5.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Messick / Allison Brown vs Spring Walsh / Deirdre Hjelt6-1, 7-5
2022-10-05vs Devaney/Tsuei 40+ 5.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Messick / Chrystal Land vs Melinda Tucker / Liz Busch6-1, 7-6
2022-09-21vs Davis 40s 5.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesMariann Van Ryen / Donna Burick vs Cindy Wood / Evie Curley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-14vs Devaney/Tsuei 40+ 5.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Messick / Chrystal Land vs Angela Greene / Meredith Lantz6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMariann Van Ryen / Vicki Pearson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-31vs Davis 40s 5.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariann Van Ryen / Donna Burick vs Deirdre Hjelt / Teresa Sagraves4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-10vs Davis 40s 5.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesMariann Van Ryen / Donna Burick vs Teresa Sagraves / Sharon Williams7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-03vs Devaney/Tsuei 40+ 5.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Messick / Chrystal Land vs Angela Greene / Cheryl Ryding3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Melissa Gujrati
published
3.00
Medy Wurth
published
2.93
Angie Messick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Allison Brown
published 3
2.90
Donna Burick
published 3
2.89
Janice Wilkinson
published
2.88
Laura Walters
published
2.82
Sarah Nielsen
published
2.76
Suzi Jackson
published
2.65
Mariann Van Ryen
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Messick + Mariann Van Ryen201555% games−9.7% vs expected
Medy Wurth + Janice Wilkinson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Gujrati
19W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Medy Wurth
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Angie Messick
103W–78L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Allison Brown
19W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Donna Burick
33W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Janice Wilkinson
11W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Laura Walters
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
2.88
Sarah Nielsen
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Suzi Jackson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Mariann Van Ryen
121W–99L career · 13 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.