Teams

LFTCS VANDEVEER

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-09vs MEMPK MARKLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Obenchain / Carmen Ekblad vs Anne Mark / Bonnie Iten3-6, 3-6
2021-09-02vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs Shelby Johnson6-2, 6-4
2021-08-26vs PBTC DAWIDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlohalani Kaleo / Lisa VanDeVeer vs Laurel Baum / Emily Vidmar6-3, 6-1
2021-08-19vs MEMPK LOWERYLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa VanDeVeer / Alohalani Kaleo vs Olivia Boudreau / Kassia Garfield3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-08-17vs CCW ROBINSWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlohalani Kaleo / Amy Obenchain vs Judith Coughlin / Joyce Dickinson6-4, 6-0
2021-07-29vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlohalani Kaleo / Lisa VanDeVeer vs Kathleen White / Theresa Watson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lorin Barcus
published
3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Lisa VanDeVeer
published
3.33
Alohalani Kaleo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Andrea Brown
published 3
3.24
Amy Obenchain
published 3.5
3.07
Ruth Zwolinski
published
Lynn Zellmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Zwolinski + Amy Obenchain161151% games+1.6% vs expected
Lynn Zellmann + Lisa VanDeVeer5255% games−1.9% vs expected
Alohalani Kaleo + Carmen Ekblad8357% games−11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorin Barcus
47W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–73L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
Lisa VanDeVeer
41W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Alohalani Kaleo
129W–63L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
3
Andrea Brown
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%2%98%
3.28
3.5
Amy Obenchain
23W–18L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Ruth Zwolinski
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
3.07
Lynn Zellmann
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.