Teams

Senioritas

2021 Adult 70 and Over League · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-12-13vs Victorious SecretWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Gleason / Julie Hugo vs Gaylien Fujioka / Eunice Hashimoto2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Matilde Narido vs Donna Duryea / Carolyn Goff6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Iida / Debbie Shigehara vs Amy Brotzman / Gloria Gomez0-6, 3-6
2021-12-01vs Hawaii 7-0Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Gleason / Julie Hugo vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Barbara Nagata4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJane Iida / Larie Kent vs Ellen Higa / KATHLEEN OLDFATHER6-3, 6-4
2021-11-07vs Hawaii 7-0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Markham / Matilde Narido vs Mildred Kaneshiro / Janice Nakahara3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Iida / Debbie Shigehara vs Ellen Higa / Meg Saunders1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElaine Reed / Joann Tanimoto vs Gerry Hasegawa / KATHLEEN OLDFATHER6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-11-06vs Victorious SecretLost 12
W#1 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Matilde Narido vs Amy Brotzman / Eunice Hashimoto6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Gleason / Elaine Reed vs Carolyn Goff / June Taguma3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Iida / Joann Tanimoto vs Charlotte Etling / Gloria Gomez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Matilde Narido
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Tricia Kezeli
published 3
2.87
Anne Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Elaine Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.16
Jane Iida
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jane Markham
published
Joann Tanimoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Hugo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Larie Kent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Hugo + Elaine Reed5353% gamesnot enough data
Larie Kent + Joann Tanimoto2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Matilde Narido
28W–34L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Tricia Kezeli
69W–98L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Anne Gleason
61W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Elaine Reed
56W–78L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Jane Iida
35W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jane Markham
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joann Tanimoto
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Hugo
35W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Larie Kent
44W–38L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.