Teams

LMFlanagan/CSD

2022 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Men 9.0 Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-28vs LMFerrero/PACLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Flanagan / Vincent Altamura vs Samuel Kopchick / Jack Horowitz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-21vs LMFerrero/PACWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Gay / Vincent Altamura vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Rogers Warner vs Jack Horowitz / William Carey6-4, 6-1
2022-04-14vs LMFerrero/PACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Flanagan / Charles Quinn vs William Carey / Keith Kye3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Frederick Armstrong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-07vs LMFerrero/PACLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Quinn / Jon Koceja vs Neil Handelsman / Robert Fryer5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVincent Altamura / Michael Flanagan vs Keith Kye / Brad Rush4-6, 1-6
2022-04-04vs LMFerrero/PACLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Frederick Armstrong vs Todd Sommers / Brad Rush2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVincent Altamura / David Carter vs Keith Kye / Samuel Kopchick2-6, 2-6
2022-03-24vs LMFerrero/PACLost 01
L#3 DoublesRogers Warner / Vincent Altamura vs Todd Sommers / Brad Rush1-6, 3-6
2022-03-17vs LMFerrero/PACLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Quinn / Steve Brinkman vs Todd Sommers / Jeff Watson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-10vs LMFerrero/PACLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Charles Quinn vs Todd Sommers / Jeff Watson3-6, 4-6
2022-03-03vs LMFerrero/PACLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Frederick Armstrong vs Jeff Watson / Todd Sommers1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 9.0 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Rogers Warner
published
4.05
Steve Brinkman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Jon Koceja
published
3.93
Charles Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.76
Vincent Altamura
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Todd Brandon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Brinkman + Charles Quinn2941% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rogers Warner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Steve Brinkman
67W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Jon Koceja
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Charles Quinn
70W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
4
Vincent Altamura
103W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Todd Brandon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.