Teams

SD 4.5 FRCC/ Doyle

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles SD- WE · SD WE Women 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesKami Guerrier / Mia Babson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesCarla Hansen / Kellie Doyle vs Lauren Weiner / Stephanie Misola6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-12vs SD 4.5 SDTRC/ MilburnWon 10
W#3 DoublesKellie Doyle / Christina Bernstein vs Kerry Ott / Ashley Jay4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-11-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesKellie Doyle / Christina Bernstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKellie Doyle / Susan Lee vs Ifunanya Aniefuna / Tina Giubilato0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMia Babson / Kathy Williams vs Tiffany Kellogg / Irina Shkov3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErin Wall / Kellie Doyle vs Hillary Park / Anne-Maria Leistikow2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesCarla Hansen / Kellie Doyle vs Tiffany Kellogg / Richette Lock6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMia Babson / Susan Lee vs Darlene Gallego / Carolynne Yen1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD WE Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Carla Hansen
published 4.5
4.22
Katherine Steinberg
published
4.15
Angela Hart
published 4
4.13
Kami Guerrier
published
4.09
Christina Bernstein
published 4.5
4.08
Kellie Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Erin Wall
published
3.72
Jane Khouw
published
3.55
Mia Babson
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Wall + Christina Bernstein2347% games−10.1% vs expected
Kami Guerrier + Kellie Doyle134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hansen
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
Katherine Steinberg
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
4
Angela Hart
36W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
4.15
Kami Guerrier
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Christina Bernstein
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Kellie Doyle
129W–116L career · 6 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
4.08
Erin Wall
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
Jane Khouw
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Mia Babson
52W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.