Teams

Be.Farrell55C

2024 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-03vs Le.Edmondson55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Boneham / Darsan Russo vs Carolyn Wieber / Ellen Zimmerman4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-19vs La.Edgerton55CWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Farrell / Bethany Stempien vs Elena Ryzhikova / Joyce Stevenson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-12vs Le.Edmondson55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngie McNeill / Darsan Russo vs Beth Shelly / Rebecca Glendy2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBethany Stempien / Vickie Dagit vs Anne Axberg / Corinne Alavi0-6, 5-7
2024-09-09vs Lo.Venable55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesVickie Dagit / Grace Poole vs Alisa Miller / Janet Murphy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Farrell / Bethany Stempien vs Dane Brackett / Krissy Caro4-6, 4-6
2024-08-29vs La.Edgerton55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Rea / Bethany Stempien vs Laura Edgerton / Beth Pegram2-6, 2-6
2024-08-22vs Le.Edmondson55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Darsan Russo vs Corinne Alavi / Jennifer McFarling5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Marks / Bethany Stempien vs Carolyn Wieber / Lea Edmondson2-6, 0-6
2024-08-21vs La.Edgerton55CLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa McDermott / Darsan Russo vs Elena Ryzhikova / Denise Gold6-7, 1-6
2024-08-15vs Lo.Venable55CLost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Dagit / Bethany Stempien vs Donna Driscoll / Michele Lee2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Beth Farrell
published 3
2.83
Lisa McDermott
published
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Grace Poole
published 2.5
2.24
Bethany Stempien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Angie McNeill
published 2.5
2.14
Darsan Russo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bethany Stempien + Vickie Dagit2533% gamesnot enough data
Lisa McDermott + Beth Farrell123 matchesnot enough data
Bethany Stempien + Darsan Russo033 matchesnot enough data
Vickie Dagit + Darsan Russo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Farrell
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
Lisa McDermott
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Vickie Dagit
29W–97L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Grace Poole
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Bethany Stempien
78W–106L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Angie McNeill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Darsan Russo
69W–104L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.