Teams

RCCB - Aboud

2026 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-16vs Brevard/SalvatoreLost 13
L#1 DoublesRachel Gould / Brenda Tarquinio vs Julianne Moore / Angila Burke1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin Schlitts vs Katie Recker5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaryanne Donigan / Eileen Mcelwee vs Kimberly Dooley / Suzanne McBride0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLael Woods / Chonda Rodrigo-butler vs Heather Taylor / Yvonne Salvatore5-7, 4-6
2026-02-23vs RCCB - HingleLost 13
L#1 DoublesErin Schlitts / Rachel Gould vs Kerry Sawyer / Liliana Gutierrez1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesChonda Rodrigo-butler vs Lindsay Nichols4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaryanne Donigan / Eileen Mcelwee vs Katherine Hingle / Ruthan Tattersall6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephanie Lasko / Lael Woods vs Christy Galzerano / Tricia Patterson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Maryanne Donigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Rachel Gould
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Erin Schlitts
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Eileen Mcelwee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Cyndi Mcdougall
published 3
2.49
Lael Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Michelle Kne
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Aboud
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lael Woods + Stephanie Lasko1440% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Gould + Erin Schlitts134 matchesnot enough data
Maryanne Donigan + Chonda Rodrigo-butler224 matchesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Mcelwee + Maryanne Donigan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maryanne Donigan
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Rachel Gould
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Schlitts
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Eileen Mcelwee
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Stephanie Lasko
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Cyndi Mcdougall
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Michelle Kne
8W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Stephen Aboud
23W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.