Teams

ML Birtles SSL A40-3.0W

2023 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-31vs MVS McMahon SSL A40-3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Taiber / Mandy Jurkovic vs Jennifer Costa / Tracy Missad4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelody Werner / Sue Birtles vs Mary McMahon / Tonja Walker6-3, 6-4
2023-05-24vs HC Bassett SSL A40-3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSue Birtles / Mara McGill vs Lori Bloenk / Courtney Thompson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Taiber / Susanne Mohr vs Carol Bassett / Pat Eldean7-6, 7-5
2023-05-10vs WH Kamerling SSL A40-3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMara McGill / Sue Birtles vs Lori Green / Corin Nulty1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelody Werner / Susanne Mohr vs ROSEANN BLAHNIK / Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDona McGovern / Sherill Hacker vs Margaret Cancro / Anna Clement2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-04-26vs MY Guy SSL A40-3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue Birtles / Mandy Jurkovic vs Lori Earls / Christine Douma2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Taiber / Cheryl Fedewa vs Mary Lou Guy / Cathy Wisloski2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDona McGovern / Melody Werner vs Belinda McDougal / Lora Krone7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-12vs PA Vis SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Birtles / Mandy Jurkovic vs Deb Vis / Tracy Sodini4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDona McGovern / Melody Werner vs Nancy Krupp / NORMA ORTIZ-ROBINSON2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Fedewa / Sherill Hacker vs Sally Chandler / Lynne Bass3-6, 2-6
2023-03-15vs MC Labadia SSL A40-3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Taiber / Mandy Jurkovic vs Monica Fisher / Nicolette Straley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Everett / Dona McGovern vs Carol Cameron / Paula Cunningham6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSue Birtles / Mara McGill vs Brandi Labadia / Belinda Best7-6, 7-5
2023-02-15vs COE VanWieren SSL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Taiber / Mandy Jurkovic vs Nancy Lange / Marcia Bratschi-Gresens6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelody Werner / Dona McGovern vs Andree Almer / Kimberly Wells1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Fedewa / Sherill Hacker vs Jill Mazzola / Susan Woods4-6, 2-6
2023-02-01vs MVS Miller-Heys SSL A40-3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMandy Jurkovic / Kim Neir vs Debra Sweemer / Tara Herrington3-0
L#2 DoublesMara McGill / Melody Werner vs Jill Gott-Gleason / Kelly Kluting6-7, 2-3
L#3 DoublesDona McGovern / Sherill Hacker vs Susan Richardson / Jean Gawlak-Suggs3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Julie Taiber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Sue Birtles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Debra Everett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Dona McGovern
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Melody Werner
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.67
Kim Neir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Cheryl Fedewa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Mandy Jurkovic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mara McGill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sherill Hacker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susanne Mohr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Birtles + Julie Taiber4157% games+12.2% vs expected
Mara McGill + Sue Birtles5157% games+6.7% vs expected
Melody Werner + Julie Taiber6457% games−2.2% vs expected
Melody Werner + Dona McGovern2841% games−10.1% vs expected
Melody Werner + Susanne Mohr134 matchesnot enough data
Melody Werner + Sue Birtles314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Neir + Mandy Jurkovic224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Taiber + Dona McGovern134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Taiber
21W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Sue Birtles
20W–16L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Debra Everett
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Dona McGovern
24W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Melody Werner
40W–70L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
Kim Neir
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Cheryl Fedewa
9W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.26
Mandy Jurkovic
6W–9L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mara McGill
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherill Hacker
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susanne Mohr
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.