Teams

CFong-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-27vs JCollins-SVCWon 21
W#1 SinglesCatherine Fleming vs Jessica Winger6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCara Fong vs Natasha Wiley3-4
W#3 SinglesSybil Pye vs Lori Small6-3, 6-4
2025-06-20vs PDavis2-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesColleen Starns vs Pamela Howell-Davis4-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs JCollins-SVCLost 01
L#1 SinglesColleen Starns vs Laura Malahias4-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs JSpencer-ENOWon 21
W#1 SinglesSophia Anderson vs Jordan Albrecht3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Haderer vs Kylie Herst4-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesCara Fong vs Juliet Kelly6-4, 6-4
2025-05-23vs PDavis2-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesColleen Starns vs Ashley Hinton6-0, 6-1
2025-05-16vs EPatulski-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesColleen Starns vs Sophia Ewing3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesColleen Starns vs Nancy Truong6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Sophia Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Cara Fong
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.47
Colleen Starns
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.46
Sina Mathew
published
2.43
Elizabeth Haderer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Catherine Fleming
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Sybil Pye
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Marjory Moreau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Anderson + Elizabeth Haderer7358% games+8.3% vs expected
Colleen Starns + Cara Fong3261% gamesnot enough data
Cara Fong + Catherine Fleming303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Anderson
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Cara Fong
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Sina Mathew
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Elizabeth Haderer
11W–9L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.43
2.5
Catherine Fleming
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sybil Pye
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.10
Marjory Moreau
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.