Teams

Liu/META

2025 Tri-Level 18 & over-META · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-28vs Kneisley/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Kevin Wang vs Aanandraj Jhaveri / Adam Kneisley7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJerry Deehan / Jeff Moffatt vs Chris Blackstone / Robert Bunch6-2, 7-5
2025-08-27vs Addison/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Kevin Wang vs Paul Narula / Robert Koutsouvelis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGareth Rowlands / Akshit Griwan vs John Graham / Tim Sturgill6-0, 6-2
2025-08-20vs Addison/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Akshit Griwan vs Kelly Williams / Paul Narula6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDoug Levin / Jeff Moffatt vs Elijah Abel / Michael Sweetman6-1, 6-1
2025-08-17vs Kneisley/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Vollmer / Gareth Rowlands vs Adam Kneisley / Aanandraj Jhaveri6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Garrett / Doug Levin vs Donald Lovins / Troy Moore6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Moffatt / Jerry Deehan vs Chris Blackstone / Timothy Heimbach6-3, 7-6
2025-08-13vs Kneisley/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Wang / Joseph Vollmer vs Adam Kneisley / Aanandraj Jhaveri6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKe Liu / Akshit Griwan vs Donald Lovins / Steven Stafford6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJerry Deehan / Jeff Moffatt vs Timothy Heimbach / Chris Blackstone6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liu/META50150171
2Kneisley/META3381021156
3Addison/META0511429178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Joseph Vollmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Doug Levin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.63
Gareth Rowlands
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jerry Deehan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Akshit Griwan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Jeff Moffatt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Moffatt + Jerry Deehan314 matchesnot enough data
Gareth Rowlands + Joseph Vollmer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Vollmer
21W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
3
Doug Levin
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.81
3.5
Gareth Rowlands
21W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Jerry Deehan
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Akshit Griwan
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Moffatt
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.