← Teams

Ad.Whitesell40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-26vs Do.Marks40SWon 2–1
W#1 SinglesDavid Gorman vs Jonathan Drum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAdam Whitesell vs John Gouveia2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDoug Silverman vs Douglas Marks6-0, 6-3
2026-07-19vs Li.Larson40SLost 1–2
L#1 SinglesRoyce Burns vs Harrison Fell6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDoug Silverman vs Demar Neal4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMarcus Tuttle vs Duane Hall6-0, 6-2
2026-07-05vs Jo.Hulicki40SWon 2–1
L#1 SinglesRobert Zimardo vs Spence Huffstetler3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew DeLorme vs John Hulicki6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRoyce Burns vs David Clark4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-28vs Ch.Nystrom40SWon 3–0
W#1 SinglesDavid Dare vs William Slocum6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAndrew DeLorme vs Clay Parker6-1, 3-1
W#3 SinglesRobert Zimardo vs Patrick Webb6-3, 6-3
2026-06-21vs Do.Marks40SWon 3–0
W#1 SinglesDavid Dare vs Jonathan Drum6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDavid Gorman vs Douglas Marks6-2, 4-1
W#3 SinglesMarcus Tuttle vs Todd Blevins6-2, 6-0
2026-06-14vs Li.Larson40SWon 3–0
W#1 SinglesDoug Silverman vs Harrison Fell6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDavid Gorman vs Duane Hall6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAdam Whitesell vs David Coman6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-31vs Jo.Hulicki40SWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesAdam Whitesell vs Stephen Cole6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRoyce Burns vs Harold Rabinovitz6-4, 6-2
2026-05-17vs Ch.Nystrom40SWon 2–0
W#1 SinglesDavid Gorman vs Eric Forti6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRoyce Burns vs Patrick Webb6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ad.Whitesell40S7120411130
2Do.Marks40S4391226192
3Jo.Hulicki40S35101429237
4Li.Larson40S3591533241
5Ch.Nystrom40S2581327193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
David Dare
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
David Gorman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Marcus Tuttle
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Andrew DeLorme
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Adam Whitesell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Robert Zimardo
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.10
Royce Burns
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published —
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
David Dare
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
David Gorman
10W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Marcus Tuttle
80W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Andrew DeLorme
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Adam Whitesell
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Robert Zimardo
44W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
—
Royce Burns
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.