Teams

CP GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Demong / Michael Hallowell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-22vs GTC GOLDWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Fahlbusch / Michael Hallowell vs Brian Berglund / G F Tanham6-2, 6-3
2025-07-15vs MC GOLDLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Fahlbusch / Richard Best vs Scott Bice / Michael Gomez6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheo Mandel / Andy James vs Scott Collins / Brant Lahnert4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hallowell / Michael Demong vs Steve Fisher / John Wadden4-6, 3-6
2025-07-08vs DTC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Demong / Michael Hallowell vs Bruce Fong / Lloyd-Norton Cutler6-1, 6-3
2025-06-24vs MC GOLDWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndy James / Theo Mandel vs Scott Collins / Brant Lahnert4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Fahlbusch / Michael Hallowell vs Scott Bice / Steve Fisher7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Best / David Bowman vs Edward Kolb / David Thompson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTP GOLD6115615151
2CP GREEN4212617140
3BTA-IBM NAVY339920153
4PCC BLUE1661531228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
David Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Richard Best
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Chris Fahlbusch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Andy James
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Michael Hallowell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Theo Mandel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Eddie Schroback
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Best + David Bowman17360% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Bowman
30W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
Richard Best
32W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Chris Fahlbusch
35W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Andy James
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Michael Hallowell
75W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Theo Mandel
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Eddie Schroback
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.