Teams

CSRC KULICH

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-20vs MEMPK GWARTNEYLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Brames / Jennifer Rodgers vs Pam Boyd / Kristi Smith2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBritton Walker vs Stacie Ross3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Harold / Debra-ann Madsen vs Julie Didier / Tracy Jobman3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-13vs FHCS SHELTONLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Brames / Debra-ann Madsen vs Lindsey Fox / Kelly Shelton0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Rodgers vs Natalie Johnson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Harold / Christy Williams vs Meggan Herington / Shelia Booth2-6, 0-6
2026-08-06vs PBCP CACKOVICLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Brames / Britton Walker vs Carla Cackovic / Lori Duran3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rodgers / Debra-ann Madsen vs Emily Borrego / Hannah Hayes4-6, 1-6
2026-07-30vs FLYHS LIULost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Harold / Jennifer Rodgers vs Megan Keyes / Beth Mancini2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Brames vs Jill Rosen Campbell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Williams / Kelsey Lyons Medina vs Suzanne Bowland / Erika Liu0-6, 1-6
2026-07-23vs CCOC ADAMSLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Brames / Christy Williams vs Samantha Fuentes / Caroline Sullivan0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rodgers / Tammy Harold vs Shacara Quarles / Rebecca Boyle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jeff Kulich
published 3.5
2.70
Christy Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Jennifer Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
1.94
Britton Walker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.87
Nancy Brames
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
1.85
Debra-ann Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.77
Tammy Harold
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.72
Kelsey Lyons Medina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Brames + Christy Williams0512% games−37.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeff Kulich
21W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
2.5
Christy Williams
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.70
Jennifer Rodgers
0W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Britton Walker
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Nancy Brames
1W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
2.5
Debra-ann Madsen
0W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Tammy Harold
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.77
Kelsey Lyons Medina
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.