← Teams

CGM-Borchers

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.15 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alexandra van Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 85%, also #1 Singles 8% · published 4.5
4.17
Monique Eldridge
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4.5
4.10
Colleen Sharkey
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Krista Mikalatos
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.60
Heidi Babi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Becky Rey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Gale Volk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results10 ties
2022-02-05Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Jane Clarke / Barbara Everard6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-05Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Mary Richardson / Cathy Thompson6-3, 7-6
2022-02-04Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Deborah Borchers vs Leslie Hanna / Annette McEachron6-4, 6-3
2021-09-19Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yi Zhao vs Denise Nolan / Mara Ferrari6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-25Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKrista Mikalatos / Alexandra van Hoy vs Kelly Branson / Jill Casale4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Sandi Bittler / Lydia Smith6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNenette Olson / Monique Eldridge vs Marie Picard / Amy Jean5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Alexandra van Hoy vs Juan Li / Honghui Liang7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Rey / Yumiko Pike vs Kim Gowie / Jenna Hayes6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Krista Mikalatos vs Sydney Taggart / Bo Yu6-2, 7-5
2021-07-18Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Alexandra van Hoy vs Kira Dennison Capen / Michelle Mehr3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Becky Rey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Shannon DeVall / Alix Edwards6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Babi / Gale Volk vs Raini Spitze / Xia Wu6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNenette Olson / Lisa Provost vs Linda Graham / Donna Feuerherdt7-6, 6-2
2021-06-19Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Alexandra van Hoy vs Shannon Fraser / Tara Heikila6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Nenette Olson vs Lisa Gray / Carol Woolman6-0, 6-0
2021-06-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesHeidi Babi / Alexandra van Hoy vs Annie Duong / Mariniah Prendergast6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Rey / Gale Volk vs Trina Denson / Gina Wissmiller6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Nicole Griffith / Shannon Bilstrom6-0, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Alexandra van Hoy
72W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Monique Eldridge
102W–56L career
2%98%1%
4.17
4.5
Colleen Sharkey
65W–49L career
2%98%0%
4.10
4.5
Krista Mikalatos
113W–80L career
51%49%0%
3.86
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Heidi Babi
3W–25L career
15%84%0%
3.60
4
Becky Rey
26W–49L career
43%57%0%
3.47
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
0
Gale Volk
15W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.