Teams

Acing Gracefully

Adult 40 & Over Summer · 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / DELAWARE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-07vs LFGWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Harrison / Gail Ferrigno vs Cynthia Slachta / Maria Davidson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Reinsel / Laura Travis vs Emily Serwo / Deanna Robinson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGayle Connelly / Jill Wallace vs Doris Kerr / Melanie Himsworth6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs LFGWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelinda Lee / Laura Travis vs Cynthia Slachta / Amanda Laskowski3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlison Harrison / Ayae Herman vs Lisa Kaplan / Carolyn Hurzeler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGail Ferrigno / Shirlee D'Ambrosia vs Doris Kerr / Nancy Denig7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-12vs LFGWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlison Harrison / Laura Travis vs Melanie Himsworth / CHRISTI MILLER6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelinda Lee / Kristina Alling vs Nancy Denig / Christine Bendinelli6-0, 6-3
2022-06-08vs LFGWon 30
W#1 DoublesGail Ferrigno / Alison Harrison vs Christine Bendinelli / Lisa Kaplan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSusan Johnson vs Emily Serwo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Lemole Dupont / Shirlee D'Ambrosia vs Doris Kerr / Ada Martini6-3, 6-1
2022-06-07vs LFGWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlison Harrison / Laura Travis vs Doris Kerr / Marycate McDonough6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSusan Johnson / Gayle Connelly vs Maria Davidson / Amanda Laskowski6-3, 6-1
2022-05-19vs LFGWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Harrison / Melinda Lee vs Doris Kerr / Ada Martini6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Lemole Dupont / Jill Wallace vs Laura Keeley / Ann Kmiec6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGail Ferrigno / Gayle Connelly vs Nancy Denig / Diane Doane6-1, 6-3
2022-05-12vs LFGWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Harrison / Ayae Herman vs Carolyn Hurzeler / Marycate McDonough6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Lemole Dupont / Gayle Connelly vs Amanda Laskowski / Maria Davidson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristina Alling / Melinda Lee vs Doris Kerr / Christine Bendinelli6-3, 6-4
2022-05-04vs LFGWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Johnson / Laura Travis vs Cynthia Slachta / Carolyn Hurzeler6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Lemole Dupont / Shirlee D'Ambrosia vs Melanie Himsworth / Ada Martini6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelinda Lee / Kristina Alling vs Marycate McDonough / Lisa Kaplan6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Laura Travis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.33
Laura Lemole Dupont
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Ayae Herman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Karen Kemmerer
published
Alison Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
Audrey Reinsel
published 4.5
Gail Ferrigno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Kristina Alling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Beth Rickard
published 4.5
4.18
Melinda Lee
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.11
Gayle Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jill Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shirlee D'Ambrosia
published
Susan Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Travis + Alison Harrison9075% games+22.1% vs expected
Laura Lemole Dupont + Susan Johnson6081% games+20.4% vs expected
Kristina Alling + Melinda Lee25560% games+3.1% vs expected
Gail Ferrigno + Shirlee D'Ambrosia11558% games+2.4% vs expected
Laura Lemole Dupont + Gayle Connelly7559% games−4.2% vs expected
Gail Ferrigno + Alison Harrison5158% gamesnot enough data
Laura Travis + Ayae Herman404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Johnson + Kristina Alling314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Travis
25W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Laura Lemole Dupont
128W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Ayae Herman
81W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
Karen Kemmerer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Alison Harrison
49W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Audrey Reinsel
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gail Ferrigno
70W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Kristina Alling
161W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Beth Rickard
92W–45L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
Melinda Lee
106W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Gayle Connelly
166W–152L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
Jill Wallace
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shirlee D'Ambrosia
21W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Johnson
61W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.