Teams

Vi.Dagit55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs Ca.Couch55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Sara May vs Sarah Glover / Genny Igo6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Blume / Vickie Dagit vs Kellie Bradley / Pam Weis6-4, 6-3
2025-04-17vs We.Sielaty55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Wahle / Kari Moncrief vs Tracy Lowrance / Wendy Sielaty2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJustine Saleeby / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Karen Rayda / Dawn Rusnak7-5, 7-5
2025-04-10vs Va.Fleischmann55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Vickie Dagit vs Judy Colby / Theresa Perlowski2-6, 6-7
2025-04-03vs Ca.Zimmerman55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Riemann / Karen Blume vs Carol Vervaert / Cheryl Sweitzer6-2, 6-4
2025-03-27vs Ca.Zimmerman55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Wahle / Justine Saleeby vs Cheryl Sweitzer / Ginger Sidoti6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Vickie Dagit vs Frederica Shipman / Kathleen Serow3-6, 4-6
2025-03-20vs Ca.Werder55A3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Kari Moncrief vs Kate Pirrung / Michelle Eisenberg1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Justine Saleeby vs Cathy Werder / Rebekah Mcconnell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Blume / Vickie Dagit vs Peggy Dobbins / Lisa DeMarco0-6, 0-6
2025-03-13vs Ma.Springfield55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Peggy Maslow vs Hope Tharrington / Marcia Springfield6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJustine Saleeby / Audrey Hollett vs Sonja Scalia / Mimi Crews6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Sara May vs Anne Little / Frauke Mirenda7-5, 6-1
2025-02-27vs Ca.Couch55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Peggy Maslow vs Laura Bell / Lynn Colvard6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Justine Saleeby vs Kellie Bradley / Genny Igo5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Karen Blume
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Audrey Hollett
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.71
Peggy Maslow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Joanna Valler
published
2.67
Justine Saleeby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Kari Moncrief
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
DEBRA LAUGHERY
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Kathryn Williamson
published
2.32
Randi Rosen
published
Maria Riemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DEBRA LAUGHERY + Justine Saleeby3743% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Dagit + Justine Saleeby4259% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Dagit + Karen Blume224 matchesnot enough data
Vickie Dagit + Peggy Maslow044 matchesnot enough data
DEBRA LAUGHERY + Peggy Maslow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Blume
44W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Audrey Hollett
34W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Peggy Maslow
30W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Joanna Valler
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Justine Saleeby
31W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Kari Moncrief
94W–150L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Vickie Dagit
29W–97L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
DEBRA LAUGHERY
48W–92L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.36
Randi Rosen
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.