Teams

RH:Senior Baronesses:Baron/Baron

2023 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesJanet Baron / Celia Ponvert vs Cynthia Roman / Gwen Marrion6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamelia Parker / Deborah Olisky vs Denise Toce / Janice Parla6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Silver-Bernstein / Connie Hurtt vs Setsuko McNabb / Louise Sterling1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Janet Baron vs Denise Toce / Stacy Collins6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEileen Meskill / Kate Welch vs Setsuko McNabb / Judith Mason3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamelia Parker / Deborah Olisky vs Louise Sterling / Barbara Clarke6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesPamelia Parker / Shawna Baron vs Opal Bravo / Leah Ward7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEileen Meskill / Connie Hurtt vs Lisa Mazzucco / TONI SIRACUSA1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKate Welch / Lucille Dunn vs Lucille Hage / Karen Eller5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesPamelia Parker / Carrie Silver-Bernstein vs Opal Bravo / Leah Ward5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Kate Welch vs Lisa Mazzucco / TONI SIRACUSA3-6, 3-6
2023-04-02vs SIMS:Tennis the Menace:LeeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesZofia Lavoie / Eileen Meskill vs Liz Stockwell / Sara Linsley2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShawna Baron / Lucille Dunn vs Karen Piazza / Lynn Siebert3-6, 2-6
2023-03-12vs FV:Hot Flashers:HealeySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudi Blanchet / Eileen Meskill vs Jill Fisher / Cari Anne Goodwin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKate Welch / Shawna Baron vs Deborah Sullivan / Cara Chapel7-6, 4-2
2023-03-05vs BTC:Simply smashing:Eklund/GuidryLost 12
L#1 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Judit Farkas vs Martha Guidry / Barbara Oles7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamelia Parker / Shawna Baron vs Sheri Eklund / Elizabeth Ahearn6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLucille Dunn / Vicki Schaar vs Gail Granger / Janice Marsh3-6, 5-7
2023-02-19vs FV:Hot Flashers:HealeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesShawna Baron / Carrie Silver-Bernstein vs Elizabeth Heinze / Rebecca Fishman6-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesJudit Farkas / Janet Baron vs Laura Giannone / Marianne Berman6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesConnie Hurtt / Eileen Meskill vs Cara Chapel / Victoria Gould6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-12vs MRC:Golden Girls:Jones/PezzulloLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Silver-Bernstein / Lucille Dunn vs Ann Kuegler / Janine Capanna2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesZofia Lavoie / Judi Blanchet vs Lisa Arconti / Audra Edele2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShawna Baron / Vicki Schaar vs Susan Jones / Cynthia Pezzullo3-6, 4-6
2023-02-05vs BTC:Simply smashing:Eklund/GuidryWon 21
L#1 DoublesPamelia Parker / Carrie Silver-Bernstein vs Barbara Oles / Nanci Bernstein4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesZofia Lavoie / Judit Farkas vs Sheri Eklund / Lisa Schadler Alessio6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Janet Baron vs Trudy Pearce / Martha Guidry6-3, 6-1
2023-01-08vs SIMS:Tennis the Menace:LeeWon 21
L#1 DoublesEileen Meskill / Zofia Lavoie vs Sara Linsley / Polly Edwards7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamelia Parker / Carrie Silver-Bernstein vs Teresa Perrucci / Cheryl Glasgow7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudit Farkas / Shawna Baron vs Jean Robbins / Ann Marie Schumsky6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-12-18vs MRC:Golden Girls:Jones/PezzulloLost 12
W#1 DoublesEileen Meskill / Zofia Lavoie vs Ann Kuegler / Shirley Berliner6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShawna Baron / Lucille Dunn vs Jackie Zoldy / JoAnn Lopez5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudit Farkas / Deborah Olisky vs Julie Mooney / Eileen Frattaroli0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:Golden Girls:Jones/Pezzullo012231331296
2SIMS:Tennis the Menace:Lee012211534324
3GTC:Time Fighters:Eller/Ellen Mooney012201637310
4EHTC:Service with a Smile:Marrion/Clarke012201644341
5BTC:Simply smashing:Eklund/Guidry012171947360
6RH:Senior Baronesses:Baron/Baron012142249355
7FV:Hot Flashers:Healey012112556370

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Pamelia Parker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.87
Celia Ponvert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Judit Farkas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.80
Carrie Silver-Bernstein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.77
Janet Baron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Eileen Meskill
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.54
Shawna Baron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.47
Zofia Lavoie
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Connie Hurtt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Vicki Schaar
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Lucille Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.26
Deborah Olisky
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Nancy Altschuler
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Judi Blanchet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kate Welch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Schaar + Lucille Dunn5353% games+10.7% vs expected
Celia Ponvert + Shawna Baron6462% games+10.1% vs expected
Judit Farkas + Shawna Baron4251% games+8.4% vs expected
Connie Hurtt + Kate Welch7557% games+4.8% vs expected
Lucille Dunn + Nancy Altschuler101254% games+3.9% vs expected
Zofia Lavoie + Janet Baron11853% games+3.6% vs expected
Shawna Baron + Janet Baron332552% games+2.3% vs expected
Celia Ponvert + Janet Baron9553% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamelia Parker
153W–84L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Celia Ponvert
172W–103L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
Judit Farkas
61W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Carrie Silver-Bernstein
34W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Janet Baron
178W–117L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Eileen Meskill
57W–42L career · 7 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Shawna Baron
151W–126L career · 16 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Zofia Lavoie
80W–57L career · 9 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Connie Hurtt
148W–133L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Vicki Schaar
79W–37L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Lucille Dunn
88W–84L career · 13 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Deborah Olisky
118W–87L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Nancy Altschuler
54W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Judi Blanchet
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Welch
25W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.