Teams

2 Hermitage Adams

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-10vs 9 Westwood SnyderSplit 11
W#2 SinglesDavid Blankley vs Garrett Bunting6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTed Jurkuta vs John Weiland6-7, 1-6
2025-11-05vs 7 Westwood WestSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSamuel Adams vs Bailey White2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJr Joyce vs Stan Craig7-5, 6-3
2025-11-01vs 4 CCV PahujaWon 21
W#1 SinglesTyler Agee vs Hugo Peris6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJr Joyce vs Rishi Pahuja7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJoel McClellan vs Michael Taliaferro6-7, 4-6
2025-10-15vs 6 Woodlake - ONeillLost 02
L#2 SinglesJoel McClellan vs Alfred Gamulo1-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesDouglas Lines vs Brandon ONeill3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-14vs 5 LPC MorganWon 21
W#1 SinglesDavid Blankley vs Shom Paul3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSamuel Adams vs Douglas Morgan6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJr Joyce vs Steven Smith6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-08vs 13 Chestnut Oaks CoyleLost 02
L#1 SinglesBlair Smith vs Marshall Powell4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDouglas Lines vs Lucas Ward1-6, 3-6
2025-10-01vs 10 WOCC Mullinax 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesTyler Agee vs Steve Campbell5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDavid Blankley vs Alex Burnett3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJr Joyce vs Trent McFadden5-7, 3-6
2025-09-24vs 8 MAC We R Them - PessarraLost 03
L#1 SinglesSamuel Adams vs Ariel Mejia3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoel McClellan vs John Haggai4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTed Jurkuta vs Joseph Gault3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Tyler Agee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Ted Jurkuta
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.83
David Blankley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Jr Joyce
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.69
Douglas Lines
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.58
Samuel Adams
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.51
Blair Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.48
Joel McClellan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel McClellan + Ted Jurkuta4255% games+12.6% vs expected
Blair Smith + Ted Jurkuta3353% games+11.8% vs expected
David Blankley + Tyler Agee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Agee
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Ted Jurkuta
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
David Blankley
19W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jr Joyce
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Samuel Adams
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
3
Blair Smith
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Joel McClellan
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.