Teams

The Tennis Tribe

Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.30 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs Austin Tennis PlayersLost 12
L#1 DoublesTravis Lenz / Connor Sims vs Eric White / Xavier Rodriguez7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSubu Jayaram / Juan Dekruyff vs Avery Gilbert / Michael Pan6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Ballard / Pushkar Chhajed vs Prashant Sharma / Suhail Ubaidur3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-12vs Austin Tennis PlayersWon 21
W#1 DoublesHoanh Le / Luis Abundis vs Andrew Portnoy / Eric White6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJuan Dekruyff / Subu Jayaram vs Sam Page / Chase Golden6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPushkar Chhajed / Kapil Rajurkar vs Lening Wang / Suhail Ubaidur3-6, 3-6
2024-10-12vs Austin Tennis PlayersLost 12
W#1 DoublesHoanh Le / Travis Lenz vs Eric White / Andrew Portnoy6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCody Everett / Justin Mart vs Gavin Parrish / Chase Golden2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesQuinn Davis / David Ballard vs Lening Wang / Prashant Sharma4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Hoanh Le
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Juan Dekruyff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Connor Sims
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Justin Mart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Travis Lenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Subu Jayaram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Cody Everett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Quinn Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Pushkar Chhajed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Ballard
published 4
3.65
Brad Wisdom
published 4
Kapil Rajurkar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Luis Abundis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quinn Davis + Brad Wisdom224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hoanh Le
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.72
Juan Dekruyff
77W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Connor Sims
40W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%61%39%
4.46
4.5
Justin Mart
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
Travis Lenz
20W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Subu Jayaram
31W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.15
4.5
Cody Everett
34W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
Quinn Davis
30W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Pushkar Chhajed
48W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
David Ballard
34W–40L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Brad Wisdom
56W–49L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Kapil Rajurkar
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Luis Abundis
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.