Teams

Midtown -Diaz/Lakhani

2022 Broward Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGerardo Naranjo / Andrea Cepero vs Ariane Chica / Marcus Pfenninger4-6, 1-6
2022-05-24vs Sunrise - DominiqueLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Barliza / Carlos Reyes vs Karson Volcy / Blossom Allen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLizette Ibarra / Jorge Alejandro Romo vs Revocatus Kanilwa / Janice Carter5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Cepero / Gerardo Naranjo vs Dominique Jean-Baptiste / MARCOS URRA6-7, 3-6
2022-05-12vs Broward/Wtc - RiviaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNatalia Smyth / Gerardo Naranjo vs Francisco Dugarte / Daniela Hernandez - *4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Cepero / German Avellaneda vs Franco de Andreis / Ili Montnor6-3, 7-6
2022-05-06vs Midtown - BarronWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Cepero / German Avellaneda vs Adrian Perez / Marioly Fiandor6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlkesh Mevada / Lizette Ibarra vs Felipe Soto / Linda Horta6-1, 6-2
2022-04-22vs Veltri - Chen/SassonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartha Barliza / Carlos Reyes vs Fery Corney / Sigal Sasson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Lizette Ibarra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.70
Andrea Cepero
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Carlos Reyes
published 4
3.37
Aldri Franco
published 3.5
3.28
Gerardo Naranjo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
3.15
Alkesh Mevada
published 3.5
3.14
Juan Yang
published
3.03
Martha Barliza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Natalia Smyth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aldri Franco + Andrea Cepero6162% gamesnot enough data
Martha Barliza + Carlos Reyes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lizette Ibarra
154W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Andrea Cepero
325W–163L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carlos Reyes
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Aldri Franco
131W–90L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Gerardo Naranjo
47W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
Jorge Alejandro Romo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Alkesh Mevada
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Juan Yang
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Martha Barliza
50W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Natalia Smyth
18W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.