Teams

Western: Olympus

2024 40&Over Mixed · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-05vs FullerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Texter / Amy Graybeal vs Paula Conti / Jack Fuller6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNicole McKee / Rajesh Vasudevan vs Shuman Hua / Yang Xiao6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKenneth McCoy / Katalin Mechtler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-06vs FullerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Hutschenreuter / Elisabeth Dexter vs Shuman Hua / Yang Xiao6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Domzalski / Kathleen Banks vs Mark Celmer / Debbie Todaro6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTimothy Prise / Jane Gens vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-04vs FullerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Hutschenreuter / Jane Gens vs Jack Fuller / Paula Conti6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNicole McKee / Rajesh Vasudevan vs Pauline Kuun / Darren Stohr3-6, 3-6
2024-06-27vs FullerWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Texter / Amy Graybeal vs Yang Xiao / Shuman Hua6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTimothy Prise / Elisabeth Dexter vs Jack Fuller / Paula Conti6-1, 6-1
2024-06-20vs FullerWon 30
W#1 DoublesTimothy Prise / Jane Gens vs Mark Celmer / Pauline Kuun6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRajesh Vasudevan / Katalin Mechtler vs Paula Conti / Jack Fuller6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Graybeal / Paul Hutschenreuter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-13vs FullerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Gens / Timothy Prise vs Shuman Hua / Yang Xiao6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatalin Mechtler / Kenneth McCoy vs Paula Conti / Jack Fuller6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Hutschenreuter / Kathleen Banks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Olympus60162661

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Domzalski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Amy Graybeal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Nicole McKee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Timothy Prise
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Jim Texter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elisabeth Dexter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Paul Hutschenreuter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Katalin Mechtler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Kathleen Banks
published
Jane Gens
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kenneth McCoy
published
Rajesh Vasudevan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Banks + Rajesh Vasudevan2653% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Banks + James Domzalski2356% gamesnot enough data
Rajesh Vasudevan + Katalin Mechtler3258% gamesnot enough data
Rajesh Vasudevan + Nicole McKee224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Hutschenreuter + Amy Graybeal404 matchesnot enough data
Jim Texter + Amy Graybeal314 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth McCoy + Kathleen Banks303 matchesnot enough data
James Domzalski + Katalin Mechtler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Domzalski
47W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Amy Graybeal
151W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
4.11
Nicole McKee
35W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Timothy Prise
54W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Jim Texter
87W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Elisabeth Dexter
36W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Paul Hutschenreuter
128W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Katalin Mechtler
178W–123L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kathleen Banks
87W–94L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.34
Jane Gens
34W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth McCoy
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rajesh Vasudevan
28W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.