Teams

Castle, Mandy

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Women 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-22vs Huntington, MegLost 03
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Archer vs Stephanie Sing5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMeredith Boston vs Laura Blair4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKasey McKay vs Meg Huntington3-6, 3-6
2024-12-15vs Stubbs, LizLost 12
W#1 SinglesMandy Castle vs Beverly Turner7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Archer vs Margaret Wadsworth2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMeredith Boston vs Stacey Coulter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-24vs Huntington, MegLost 02
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Archer vs MacKenzie Carmody1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMandy Castle vs Anna Miskelly1-6, 0-6
2024-11-17vs Stubbs, LizLost 02
L#1 SinglesHeather Biddle vs Cecil Patton1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Archer vs Elissa Woodruff7-6, 0-6
2024-11-03vs Collins, MindySplit 11
L#1 SinglesHeather Biddle vs Kim Pitts2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKasey McKay vs Sarah Yearick6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-27vs Huntington, MegLost 02
L#1 SinglesMandy Castle vs MacKenzie Carmody2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Archer vs Mary Kate Diltz3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Castle, Mandy0651329186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Heather Biddle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Mandy Castle
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.23
Elizabeth Archer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Meredith Boston
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Kasey McKay
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Biddle + Elizabeth Archer5356% games+8.1% vs expected
Mandy Castle + Meredith Boston5553% games+7.9% vs expected
Heather Biddle + Meredith Boston224 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Boston + Kasey McKay213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heather Biddle
36W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.38
Mandy Castle
47W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Archer
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Meredith Boston
28W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Kasey McKay
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.