Teams

Apollo

2025 Sandhills Summer Singles Adult 18 & over · 3.5 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Caroline Bolduc
published 3.5
3.41
Pia Thompson
published
2.89
Samantha Zumwalt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Amanda Klinck
published 3
2.77
Lydia Apollo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Heather Sisk
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Sandra Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Sisk + Lydia Apollo5555% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Bolduc
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Pia Thompson
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Samantha Zumwalt
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Amanda Klinck
3W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Lydia Apollo
71W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Heather Sisk
51W–69L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Sandra Jones
27W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.