Teams

Not My Fault

2025 SETX 55 & Over · 7.0 SENIOR WOMEN

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-17vs PENNY VAYONLost 12
W#1 DoublesDee Dee Siebe / Denise Frantz vs Jill Williams / Theresa Edwards6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Martin / Angie LaBiche vs Penny Vayon / Sandra Millsaps3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Berry / Melissa Wong vs Stephany Bryant / Irma Salazar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-09vs PENNY VAYONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDee Dee Siebe / Denise Frantz vs Penny Vayon / Carol Davis6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMelissa Wong / Kathy Berry vs Wendy Nobles / Irma Salazar2-6, 0-6
2025-02-08vs PENNY VAYONLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Berry / Melissa Wong vs Catherine Taylor / Wendy Nobles1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Adams / Tammie Gilfillian vs Maria Mercado / Irma Salazar6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDee Dee Siebe / Sarah Keating vs Theresa Edwards / Maru Acabado2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-29vs PENNY VAYONWon 10
W#2 DoublesDee Dee Siebe / Denise Frantz vs Carol Davis / Wendy Nobles6-1, 6-4
2025-01-25vs PENNY VAYONWon 20
W#1 DoublesDee Dee Siebe / Denise Frantz vs Maru Acabado / Theresa Edwards6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammie Gilfillian / Michelle Adams vs Stephany Bryant / Wendy Nobles6-0, 6-4
2025-01-08vs PENNY VAYONWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandra Martin / Angie LaBiche vs Jill Williams / Irma Salazar7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDee Dee Siebe / Sarah Keating vs Carol Davis / Theresa Edwards7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Adams / Tammie Gilfillian vs Maria Mercado / Catherine Taylor3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 SENIOR WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Denise Frantz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Dee Dee Siebe
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.92
Angie LaBiche
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Kathy Berry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tammie Gilfillian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Frantz + Dee Dee Siebe6161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Frantz
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Dee Dee Siebe
18W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3
Angie LaBiche
22W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kathy Berry
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammie Gilfillian
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.