Teams

Team Bocina

2026 18&Over Women Spring · 5.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.80 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-27vs NJ:Team LeeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hammer / Amy Ankeny vs Abby Decker / Charlotte McDonough-Roarty3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Bocina / Sladja Carton vs Catherine Phillips / Angelina Frankovic6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-26vs NJ:Team LeeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Ankeny / Karin Weiner vs Catherine Phillips / Emily Snyder5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Tirone / Kimberly Rosenthal vs Joanna Roth / Adrienne Supino3-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs NJ:Team LeeLost 12
L#1 DoublesSladja Carton / Janine Roth vs Abby Decker / Renee Lee4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSydney Vine vs Charlotte McDonough-Roarty1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Ankeny / Kimberly Rosenthal vs Adrienne Supino / Catherine Phillips5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-11vs NJ:Team LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hammer / Kimberly Rosenthal vs Emily Snyder / Joanna Roth0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Collins / Karin Weiner vs Natasha Scrivani / Renee Lee2-6, 4-6
2026-06-06vs NJ:Team LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanine Roth / Sladja Carton vs Charlotte McDonough-Roarty / Abby Decker3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKristen Bocina / Betsy Ricker vs Renee Lee / Angelina Frankovic2-6, 1-6
2026-06-05vs NJ:Team LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Rosenthal / Elena DeBarbadillo vs Emily Snyder / Natasha Scrivani2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanine Roth / Betsy Ricker vs Joanna Roth / Catherine Phillips0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Elena DeBarbadillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.71
Amy Ankeny
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.50
Karin Weiner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.48
Sydney Vine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.42
Kimberly Rosenthal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.38
Sarah Tirone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Janine Roth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
Kristen Bocina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Betsy Ricker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Sladja Carton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Amy Collins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.13
Melissa Hammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Collins + Kimberly Rosenthal8268% games+10.1% vs expected
Sarah Tirone + Kimberly Rosenthal16563% games+8.9% vs expected
Melissa Hammer + Kimberly Rosenthal12654% games+4.4% vs expected
Elena DeBarbadillo + Amy Collins381956% games+3.4% vs expected
Kimberly Rosenthal + Janine Roth6171% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Tirone + Melissa Hammer2345% gamesnot enough data
Elena DeBarbadillo + Kimberly Rosenthal1439% gamesnot enough data
Karin Weiner + Elena DeBarbadillo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elena DeBarbadillo
115W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
4.76
5
Amy Ankeny
44W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.71
Karin Weiner
58W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.50
Sydney Vine
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
4.48
Kimberly Rosenthal
79W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
4.42
Sarah Tirone
70W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
83%17%<1%
4.38
Janine Roth
33W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
Kristen Bocina
60W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Betsy Ricker
84W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Sladja Carton
86W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
4.14
5
Amy Collins
127W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
4.14
Melissa Hammer
53W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.