Teams

Kilauea Heat

2026 Adult 18 and Over League · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs Screamin ChickensWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngelica Bias / Jhoanna Mabutas vs Cindy Lam / Stephanie Doan6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRita Wang vs Natassha Pablo6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharyl Shultz / Susan Fazekas vs Shina Degucci / Biljana Baker6-3, 6-4
2026-05-03vs Screamin ChickensWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey Lyum / Susan Fazekas vs Jolanta Kiepas / Charalyn Tanaka6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHelene Freni-rogers vs Shina Degucci6-4, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Screamin ChickensWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Fazekas / Helene Freni-rogers vs Tiffanie Masutani / Natassha Pablo6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracey Lyum / Sharyl Shultz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-26vs Screamin ChickensWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Fazekas / Helene Freni-rogers vs Jolanta Kiepas / Biljana Baker6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSharyl Shultz vs Charalyn Tanaka6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJhoanna Mabutas / Tracey Lyum vs Natassha Pablo / Tiffanie Masutani6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs Screamin ChickensWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharyl Shultz / Helene Freni-rogers vs Charalyn Tanaka / Cindy Lam6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJhoanna Mabutas vs Tiffanie Masutani1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRita Wang / Emily Humber vs Biljana Baker / Jolanta Kiepas6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-04vs Screamin ChickensWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Humber / Tracey Lyum vs Biljana Baker / Shina Degucci6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSharyl Shultz vs Jolanta Kiepas2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHelene Freni-rogers / Rita Wang vs Stephanie Doan / Natassha Pablo6-3, 6-0
2026-03-28vs Screamin ChickensWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey Lyum / Rita Wang vs Stephanie Doan / Natassha Pablo6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEmily Humber vs Biljana Baker6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kilauea Heat6015310125
2Screamin Chickens0631531184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Madeleine Dreith
published 4
2.47
Helene Freni-rogers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.44
Rita Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.32
Susan Fazekas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.30
Tracey Lyum
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.25
Angelica Bias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Jhoanna Mabutas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.15
Sharyl Shultz
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.11
Emily Humber
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jhoanna Mabutas + Sharyl Shultz0523% gamesnot enough data
Susan Fazekas + Sharyl Shultz224 matchesnot enough data
Sharyl Shultz + Tracey Lyum134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Fazekas + Emily Humber033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madeleine Dreith
58W–40L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Helene Freni-rogers
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Rita Wang
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Susan Fazekas
16W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Tracey Lyum
20W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Angelica Bias
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Jhoanna Mabutas
3W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Sharyl Shultz
12W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Emily Humber
7W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.