Teams

RCC GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs MEA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Misgen / Patricia Sato vs Diane Bohan / Joan Bleacher7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Highley / Jill Nelson vs Megan Murray / Shawna Sharp4-6, 2-6
2024-06-05vs LTA-P GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Ronlov / Diane Misgen vs Kim Britt / Michelle Snyder3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Nelson / Lisa Highley vs Julie Stockert / Patty Orban3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-29vs TTA TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Ronlov / Janice Bailey vs Vikki Hennard / Diana Merritt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs BRMST GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Misgen / Jill Nelson vs Kathy Depinto / Vickie Garn2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCher Babkiewich / Janice Bailey vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Cynthia Burchell4-6, 1-6
2024-05-15vs CVTA YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Ruth Becker / Marion Fisher6-2, 6-1
2024-05-08vs MEA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Nelson / Lisa Highley vs Jennifer Bray / Diane Bohan6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Martha Hamilton vs Susan Lewis / Cheri Belz3-6, 3-6
2024-05-01vs LTA-P GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Misgen / Martha Hamilton vs Michelle Snyder / Jackye Whalen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Patty Orban / Julie Stockert6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Highley / Patricia Sato vs Kathleen Sargent / Jan DeBruin6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Janice Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Highley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindy Ronlov
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Diane Misgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kristine Foulk
published
Patricia Sato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Ronlov + Janice Bailey552858% games+1.3% vs expected
Cindy Ronlov + Diane Misgen8450% games−0.5% vs expected
Lisa Highley + Janice Bailey4254% games−3.5% vs expected
Lisa Highley + Diane Misgen3541% games−7.4% vs expected
Diane Misgen + Janice Bailey134 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Foulk + Lisa Highley123 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Foulk + Diane Misgen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janice Bailey
95W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Lisa Highley
71W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cindy Ronlov
112W–72L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Diane Misgen
72W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kristine Foulk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Sato
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.