Teams

Nelson/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-09vs Ray/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Palazola / Cathy Herrington vs Allison Fowler / Claire Murk2-6, 6-7
2026-05-02vs Biedenharn/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Herrington / Allison Palazola vs Louise Biedenharn / Emily Edge3-6, 4-6
2026-04-25vs Wright/MemphisLost 01
L#1 SinglesCathy Herrington vs Cristina Guibao0-6, 1-6
2026-04-22vs Taylor/MemphisLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoelle Rogin vs Amanda Clayton6-2, 2-2
2026-04-18vs JLewis/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Palazola / Diana Sanders vs Deanne Helvering / Tina David7-5, 6-1
2026-04-16vs SLewis/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Herrington / Diana Sanders vs Sally Lewis / Patricia Barker3-6, 3-3
W#1 SinglesJoelle Rogin vs Casey Gleysteen6-3, 7-5
2026-04-04vs Blanton/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Herrington / Allison Palazola vs Beth Price / Sarah Richardson4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Sanders vs Greer Moyes3-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Justice/MemphisLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeating Lowery / Diana Sanders vs Meredith Brasfield / Sophie Cunningham3-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs Flynt/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdee Davis / Diana Sanders vs Tanner Baker / Amanda Whittington0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Herrington / Margaret Roney vs Christa George / Anne Jordan6-2, 7-5
2026-03-07vs Cleveland/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulia McDonald / Joelle Rogin vs Lauren Downs / Christa Smith6-1, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 2.5 Women 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor/Memphis64171329227
2Biedenharn/Memphis64141635290
3Dahlgren/Memphis5212922178
4JLewis/Memphis55161431249
5Powers/Memphis4312922183
6Nelson/Memphis1982246311
7Ferrara/Memphis0751635219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.17
Joelle Rogin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Cathy Herrington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
1.95
Diana Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Keating Lowery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joelle Rogin
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Cathy Herrington
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Diana Sanders
4W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Keating Lowery
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.